Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy

The management of criminal records within the Iranian legal system, despite reform-oriented approaches reflected in higher-level policy documents, has become one of the principal obstacles to the realization of criminal justice and the prevention of recidivism. Employing a descriptive–analytical method and grounded in labeling theory, this study examines the pathology of the gap between “law in the books” and “law in action.” The central issue concerns analyzing the causes underlying the inefficiency of Articles 25 and 26 of the Islamic Penal Code (2013) in eliminating the adverse consequences of criminal records, as well as investigating the process through which “legal punishment” transforms into “permanent social exclusion.” The findings indicate that the duality between “legal rehabilitation” and the perpetual retention of information within law-enforcement databases, combined with indiscriminate occupational restrictions and employers’ risk-averse practices, has resulted in the blockage of reintegration pathways and the emergence of “secondary deviance” among convicted individuals. In effect, the criminal justice system, by preserving what may be described as an institutional “memory of dangerousness,” unintentionally contributes to the reproduction of criminal cycles. To overcome this structural impasse, the present article proposes a model of “hybrid penology,” grounded in a transition from “mechanical exclusion” toward “intelligent risk management.” Key policy solutions include the legal recognition of the right to be forgotten, the specialization and proportionalization of social disabilities, and the smart modernization of the criminal record system based on an access-level classification model. The study concludes that sustainable security lies not in the exclusion of offenders but in their reintegration through data-driven mechanisms and post-penal support measures.

The Umayyad Caliphate represents one of the most significant periods in the political and cultural history of Islam, during which the Islamic realm rapidly expanded and evolved into a heterogeneous society composed of diverse ethnicities and cultures. Using a descriptive–analytical method and drawing upon historical sources and contemporary studies, this research examines the influence of Iranian culture on the culture of Muslim Arabs during the Umayyad era. The findings indicate that despite the official Umayyad policy emphasizing Arab superiority, in practice many Iranian cultural, administrative, and political elements penetrated the structure of the government and Islamic society. The transfer of bureaucratic systems, the continuation of the Sasanian taxation structure, the influence of courtly rituals, and the role of Iranian secretaries were among the most prominent manifestations of this influence. This cultural interaction laid the groundwork for the formation of a centralized model of governance within Islamic civilization. The significance of this issue lies in the fact that the Umayyad period constituted an intermediary stage between the simple caliphal tradition of early Islam and the complex caliphal system of later periods, particularly during the Abbasid Caliphate. Examining this period demonstrates how Iranian elements were absorbed, reinterpreted, and institutionalized within the framework of the Islamic Caliphate and what role they played in shaping the civilizational model of Islam.

Developments in Iraq after the fall of the Baath regime in 2003 turned the country into one of the most important arenas for the redistribution of power in the Middle East and created the conditions for simultaneous competition and interaction between Iran and Turkey. Influenced by geopolitical imperatives, security considerations, economic interests, and historical ties, these two actors have pursued multidimensional strategies in response to Iraq’s newly emerging political structure. Within this framework, the present study was conducted with the aim of examining competition and interaction between Iran and Turkey in Iraq and analyzing their impact on the balance of power in the Middle East. Iran, viewing Iraq as part of its surrounding security environment, has sought to contain potential threats and enhance its strategic depth in West Asia by strengthening the stability of Baghdad’s political structure, expanding security cooperation, and developing relations with Shiite actors and some Kurdish groups. By contrast, Turkey, with a focus on managing threats related to the Kurdish issue, expanding economic influence, establishing trade networks, and engaging with Sunni and Turkmen communities, has adopted a balancing strategy toward Iraq’s domestic and regional developments. The interaction between these two countries in Iraq has a multilevel nature and is reproduced at governmental, party-based, ethno-religious, economic, and security levels. This has caused the pattern of Iran–Turkey relations to move away from direct confrontation and toward a form of managed competition and strategic fluidity. The consequences of this pattern have extended beyond Iraq’s borders and have affected the formation of the balance of power in the Middle East, the configuration of regional alliances, and the pattern of influence exercised by extra-regional actors. Accordingly, the study of post-2003 Iraq has become a basis for analyzing the changing nature of power, competition, and cooperation in the contemporary Middle East.

The Paduspanians were a dynastic lineage whose rulers belonged to families claiming descent from the Sasanian Empire. This dynasty was established in 643 CE by Gil Gavbara and his son Paduspan I in the province of Ruyan, and its rule continued until 1597 CE. In 864 CE, the people of Ruyan and their Paduspanian ruler, Abdullah ibn Wanda Omid, who had become deeply dissatisfied with the oppression imposed by the representatives of the Tahirid governors of the Abbasid Caliphate, namely Muhammad ibn Abdallah al-Tahiri and Muhammad ibn Aws, sought assistance at the suggestion of Muhammad ibn Ibrahim Kiya Dabiri from Hasan ibn Zayd, who himself had migrated to the city of Ray due to pressure from the Abbasid administration. The outcome of this request was the uprising and establishment of the Zaydi state in northern Iran in the same year, a polity that endured until 928 CE. The present study addresses the question of how the relations between the Paduspanian dynasty and the Zaydi movement were formed and developed. Based on the hypothesis that the Paduspanians played a significant and constructive role in this relationship, the study aims to examine the early interactions between these two political entities. Employing a descriptive–analytical method and relying on library-based data collection, this research analyzes and interprets the nature of these relations. The findings demonstrate that the Paduspanians played an initial and substantial role in the establishment and continuation of the Zaydi movement.

The United Nations is a dynamic and global institution that is continuously engaged in the formation of a new order and the transformation from the existing state toward one aligned with justice for the advancement of human society. In pursuit of the objectives set forth in the United Nations Charter, the Organization, through its personnel, implements actions deemed optimal by the majority. In this context, staff members, as the most significant asset of the Organization, are required to undergo changes in order to enhance service delivery. It is therefore possible that, as a consequence of such changes, certain rights of employees may be infringed, necessitating the restoration of those rights through a specialized mechanism. During the period between the decision of the United Nations General Assembly in 1949 and the establishment of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, up to the present time, the system has experienced a trajectory marked by significant developments and challenges. Although the General Assembly, through Resolution 63/253 adopted in 2008, established the United Nations Dispute Tribunal and the United Nations Appeals Tribunal as replacements for the former Administrative Tribunal, the fundamental objective has remained the attainment of justice in the resolution of internal administrative disputes. This article seeks to examine various dimensions of the institutional structure and organizational framework of the United Nations administrative judicial system, as well as the procedures governing the adjudication of disputes.

An assistant prosecutor, as one of the judicial authorities of the public prosecutor’s office, is not independent vis-à-vis the prosecutor and, acting as the prosecutor’s representative, may—beyond conducting preliminary investigations in criminal cases—perform other duties of the prosecutor as well. Although the assistant prosecutor is not independent of the prosecutor and has no right to formally oppose the prosecutor’s opinion, not all decisions made by the assistant prosecutor require the prosecutor’s express opinion or approval. The lack of independence of the assistant prosecutor and the obligation to follow the prosecutor’s directives do not arise solely from, nor are they limited to, the type or nature of the duty entrusted to the assistant prosecutor. Rather, regardless of which duty the assistant prosecutor undertakes pursuant to the prosecutor’s referral, the assistant prosecutor is obligated to comply with the prosecutor’s authority. The role of the prosecutor’s representative in examining cases varies depending on the subject matter of the case, even in similar offenses. The representative reports the course of proceedings to the prosecutor, thereby keeping the prosecutor informed of developments in the case. In criminal cases, the prosecutor’s representative appears as the public claimant to supervise the correctness of the adjudicative process and to defend the enforcement of law and public rights; the representative’s presence is mandatory and serves a role comparable to that of a judge in safeguarding legal standards, rather than acting as a party to the dispute. Accordingly, the presence of the prosecutor’s representative in criminal courts is compulsory, as the representative is responsible for supervising case proceedings and the proper application of law, protecting public rights and the complainant’s claims, and submitting opinions and briefs in defense of the public interest in criminal cases. Even where there is a private complainant, the prosecutor or the prosecutor’s representative attends to ensure compliance with the law and the order of the court. Therefore, the legal basis for the representative’s presence is to guarantee the observance of justice.

Most members of society are aware of the rights they possess; however, the problem lies in the fact that they do not know how to vindicate those rights when they are violated, or, despite being aware, they are unable to reclaim them. This phenomenon—namely, the enforcement of rights—is a technical and specialized matter that is carried out by professionals, namely attorneys. Given that the conduct of attorneys is directly or indirectly connected to people’s life, property, honor, and reputation, the sensitivity of this profession becomes even more evident. This very sensitivity has historically allowed the disciplinary institutions of bar associations, in cases of deficiency or ambiguity in the legal provisions governing attorneys, to fill legislative gaps based on unwritten professional norms through codes of conduct, circulars, and the establishment of disciplinary practices. The significance of this role, along with the efforts and dedication of earlier generations of attorneys, ultimately led the legislator, in the Executive By-law of the Legal Bill on the Independence of the Bar Association adopted in 2021, to adopt a legislative policy capable of addressing many contemporary needs. Consequently, this by-law contains notable innovations, the identification, examination, and analysis of which—specifically within the scope of disciplinary violations—constitute the subject of the present article. The research method is descriptive-analytical, and the study has been conducted using library-based sources.

This article examines and provides an in-depth analysis of the factors shaping the personality of Reza Khan, the founder of the Pahlavi dynasty, through a psychological approach grounded in historical documentation. The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the psychological roots of Reza Khan’s prominent personality traits, including ambition, authoritarianism, decisiveness, discipline, as well as aspects of violence and irascibility, and ultimately to analyze how these traits influenced his political trajectory and actions. In the complex domain of political leadership, understanding the personality of leaders is essential not only for interpreting historical events but also for predicting behavioral patterns and comprehending the motivations behind critical decisions. Reza Khan, as one of the most influential figures in modern Iranian history, represents a salient example of an individual whose personality traits played a fundamental role in shaping the political and social transformations of his era. This study employs a descriptive-analytical method and draws upon the framework of personality psychology to examine historical documents, memoirs, travelogues, and contemporary reports. The data for this research are primarily collected from primary and secondary historical sources, and key concepts from Alfred Adler’s theory of individual psychology are applied for psychological analysis. Concepts such as the need for power, anxiety, defense mechanisms, and the influence of the environment on identity formation are utilized in the analysis. The findings indicate that a combination of environmental factors, early life experiences, and genetic predispositions, together with the turbulent social and political conditions of Iran in the late Qajar period, contributed to the formation of a personality characterized by traits such as an iron will, a strong inclination toward order and discipline, decisiveness in decision-making, and pronounced authoritarianism. His experience in the Cossack Brigade and exposure to insecurity and the weakness of the central government provided a conducive context for the development of authoritarian and order-imposing aspects of his personality. Furthermore, his interactions with foreign powers, particularly Britain, while influencing his path to power, also contributed to specific dimensions of his display of authority and authoritarianism. This study, through presenting a comprehensive and multidimensional analysis, contributes to a deeper understanding of Reza Khan’s personality and its impact on the fate of Iran during the Pahlavi era.