The Relationship Between Khorasani Mysticism and Andalusian Mysticism in the Medieval Period (12th Century CE): A Historical Comparative Study of the Thought of Ibn ʿArabī and Sanāʾī
Keywords:
Sanāʾī, Ibn ʿArabī, Khorasani mysticism, Andalusian mysticism, historical comparisonAbstract
This study aims to provide a historical and comparative explanation of the relationship between Khorasani mysticism and Andalusian mysticism in the 12th century CE, with a focus on the intellectual contributions of Sanāʾī and Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī. Despite the considerable geographical and cultural distance between eastern Khorasan and western al-Andalus, the mystical current in both regions emerged within the shared developments of the Islamic world, including the expansion of Sufi networks, the dynamism of scholarly centers, and the role of trade routes and pilgrimage in transmitting religious concepts. Sanāʾī, situated in the tradition of Khorasani mysticism, articulated an ethics-oriented and reformist mysticism in which religious experience, critique of political authority, and spiritual cultivation were central. In contrast, Ibn ʿArabī—shaped by the multicultural environment of al-Andalus and later the eastern Islamic lands—founded a theoretical and universal mysticism in which concepts such as waḥdat al-wujūd (unity of being), the perfect human, and the imaginal realm (ʿālam al-mithāl) assumed foundational significance. Through a comparative analysis of the shared and distinctive elements of the two mystical traditions—including the concept of love, the status of the human being, the linguistic modes of mystical expression, and the relationship between mysticism and political power—this article demonstrates that the intellectual similarities between Sanāʾī and Ibn ʿArabī are not the result of direct influence, but rather the product of broader civilizational transformations and the internal coherence of the Islamic mystical tradition. Ultimately, the article concludes that the relationship between the two traditions is one of “civilizational overlap”: Sanāʾī inaugurates the stream of ethical Khorasani mysticism, while Ibn ʿArabī constitutes the architect of theoretical mysticism in both the western and eastern Islamic worlds.
Downloads
References
1. Hashemian Bajnourd SA, Khatami A. The Theory of the Hierarchy of Beings in the Thought of Sanai. Recognition. 2022;15(2):293-317.
2. Saidi H, Feyzi S. Examining the Role of Reason in Recognizing God in the Thoughts of Sanai. Mirror of Knowledge. 2016;16(46):21-41.
3. Hanifnia E, Afzali A, Ghozbani Y, Mazarei R. Ontology in the School of Ibn Arabi. Islamic Religions Research Journal. 2021;8(15):277-93.
4. Ibn Arabi MIA. Fusus al-Hikam. 1946.
5. Jahangiri M. Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi: A Prominent Figure in Islamic Mysticism. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 2018.
6. Vahidinia A, Gholam Hosseinzadeh GH, Shabiri N, Nikoubakht N. Signs of Iranian-Islamic Mysticism in the Works of Three Andalusian Mystics: Ibn Arabi, Ibn Abbad Rundi, and San Juan de la Cruz. Literary Researches. 2018;15(61):153-84.
7. Sharifian M, Vafa'i Basir A. Commonalities Between Ibn Arabi and Rumi in the Field of Mystical Thought. Comparative Literature (Literature and Language Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities in Kerman). 2011;2(4):95-123.
8. Sanai Ghaznavi HFa-D. Hadiqat al-Haqiqah wa Sharī'at al-Tariqah. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 1956.
9. Afrasiabpour AA. The Mysticism of Sanai. Islamic Mysticism (Religions and Mysticism). 2008;5(18):1-16.
10. Kassayi Zadeh MS, Alizamani AA, Vakili H. Happiness and Meaning in the School of Ibn Arabi. Comparative Theology. 2012;3(8):43-56.
11. Foroughi N, Khodai M. The Problem of Evil in the School of Ibn Arabi. New Religious Thought. 2013;9(33):67-80.
12. Roghar M. The Path of Asceticism in Khorasan Mysticism until the Return to the First Tradition in the 7th Century. Literary Researches. 2022;19(77):125-48.
13. Roodgar M. Khorasan Mysticism and Ibn Arabi: Differences in Practice. Islamic Religions Research Journal. 2017;4(6):151-74.
14. Roustai Shalamani A, Zakeri A. Sanai and the Use of the Celestial Realm to Express Mystical Ideas in His Divan. Persian Language Studies (Shafaye Del). 2022;5(9):65-80.
15. Va'ez Monfared S, Nasiri M, Rastgufard SM. The Idea of Liberation in Pre-Islamic Religious Traditions of Khorasan and Its Impact on Khorasan Sufism. Comparative Studies of Religions and Mysticism. 2018;2(3):89-112.
16. Torabi Z, Nodehi K. The Image of Time in the Perception of Mysticism in Iran from the Beginning to the End of the 6th Century AH. Theological and Belief Studies (Islamic Sciences). 2015;5(18):37-48.
17. Hakima F, Mohseni Nia N. Comparative Study of the Mystical Unity in the Thoughts of Attar Nishapuri and Ibn Arabi. Comparative Literature (Literature and Language Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities in Kerman). 2017;9(17):21-39.
18. Sanai Ghaznavi HFa-D. Divan-e Sanai. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
19. Kasraei Far M, Ebrahimi H. Eschatological Mysticism in the Thoughts and Works of Abu al-Majd Sanai Ghaznavi. Religions and Mysticism (Articles and Reviews). 2013;46(2):277-99.
20. Javadi Imamzadeh H, Behnamfar M. Critique of the Mystical Position of Sirr al-Ibad Based on the Personality Dimensions of Sanai. Mystical Literature (Humanities Al-Zahra). 2015;7(12):103-23.
21. Kargar M, editor Critical Thoughts of Sanai in Hadiqat. International Conference of the Association for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature in Iran; 2013.
22. Mohammadi Kalesar A, Mousavi S, editors. Revisiting Humanism in Mystical Literature (Case Study: Humanism in the Thought of Sanai Ghaznavi Using Critical Analysis Method). International Conference of the Association for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature in Iran; 2015.
23. Bavandpouri S, editor Comparative Study of the Mystical Ideas of Sanai Ghaznavi and Rumi. Conference on Communication, Language, and Persian Literature and Linguistic Studies; 2016; Tehran.
24. Asadollahi K, Fathi B. The Unifying Thought of Sanai Compared to Ibn Arabi. Mythological and Mystical Literature (Persian Language and Literature). 2011;7(24):9-36.
25. Sayyadi A. The Position of the Perfect Human in Khorasan Mysticism. Nishapur: Farough Simorgh; 2024.
26. Roodgar MJ. The Rational Asceticism and Vision in the School of Ibn Arabi. Mind. 2011(47):61-97.
27. Ahmadvand A, Fayz al-Islam J. Aspects of Mysticism and Sufism in Andalusian Literature. Islamic Philosophy and Wisdom Research Journal. 2011;10(38):141-60.
28. Ibn Arabi MIA. Al-Futuhat Al-Makkiyah. Cairo: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Arabi.
29. Gharekhani N, Mohiyai N. Revisiting the Unity of Existence in the Thought of Ibn Arabi and Abdul Rahman Jami. Islamic Mysticism (Religions and Mysticism). 2022;18(71):117-36.
30. Haghighi A, Zamani M, Sadeghi A, Momeni N. Searching for the Meaning of Life in the Thoughts of Avicenna and Ibn Arabi Regarding Death and Resurrection. Comparative Theology. 2018;9(20):1-14.
31. Roodgar M. Khorasan Mysticism and Ibn Arabi: Theoretical Differences. Mystical Research Journal. 2018;10(18):51-71.
32. Azim Baglou D, Tajfar S. Sanai, Poetry, and Mysticism. Islamic Mysticism (Religions and Mysticism). 2010;7(26):103-23.
33. Mohammadi Kalesar A, Mousavi S. The Impact of Eschatology on the Mysticism of Sanai in Hadiqat al-Haqiqah. Mystical Literature and Mythology (Persian Language and Literature). 2017;13(49):173-201.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Valiollah Saki, Sarvat Soleimanzadeh Afshar, Nasrin Tavakoli (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
