Mechanisms of Popular Participation in the Consolidation and Collapse of Despotism: A Comparative Analysis of the Views of Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi and John Locke
Keywords:
political despotism, John Locke, tacit consent, Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi, popular participationAbstract
Political despotism is one of the most significant challenges of governance in human history and is reproduced not only through institutional structures and the exercise of coercive power, but also through social mechanisms and popular participation. The role of the people in this process is dual: through silence and passivity, they may contribute to the consolidation of despotism, or through awareness and resistance, they may bring about its collapse. The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyze the mechanisms of popular participation in the emergence and decline of political despotism from the perspectives of Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi and John Locke. The present research was conducted using a qualitative approach and a comparative analysis method, with data collected through documentary research and content analysis of the works of the two thinkers. The findings indicate that in Locke’s theory, tacit consent functions as a form of passive legitimation of despotism, and the transition to the right of resistance occurs when citizens become aware of the systematic violation of their natural rights. In al-Kawakibi’s theory, public ignorance, collective fear, and the complicity of elites constitute the three principal mechanisms of despotism’s stabilization, while its decline requires the elevation of awareness, the strengthening of rationality, and peaceful struggle. Points of convergence between the two thinkers include an emphasis on collective responsibility, opposition to ideological distortion, and the central role of enlightenment; however, the main divergence lies in their strategies, as Locke emphasizes the right of resistance and revolution, whereas al-Kawakibi stresses gradual cultural reform. The results of the study demonstrate that freedom is an achievement attained through awareness, responsibility, and the active participation of citizens.
Downloads
References
1. Brooker P. Non-democratic regimes: Macmillan International Higher Education; 2013. 191-230 p.
2. Linz JJ, Stepan A. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996. 110-56 p.
3. Huntington SP. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century: University of Oklahoma Press; 1991. 214-80 p.
4. Shahnooshi M. An introduction to political sociology: The sociology of democracy and despotism. Fasl-e No. 2007:56-82.
5. Kavakebi A. The characteristics of despotism: Resanesh; 2012. 120-56 p.
6. Locke J. A treatise concerning government: Nashr-e Ney; 2024. 215-25 p.
7. Sasan JMV. The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities. 2021;9(1):34-45. doi: 10.34293/sijash.v9i1.4042.
8. Ziaei M. Sociology of despotism: The syndrome of decline in a sick despotic society, a study on the causes of the persistence and dominance of communism. Omid Sokhan. 2020:41-56.
9. Fukuyama F. Liberalism and its discontents: Profile Books; 2022. 370-410 p.
10. Hasani H, Fouladi D, Ranjbar M. The reciprocal relationship between ruler and people in John Locke's thought (Based on Thomas Spragens' theory). Iranian Journal of Political Sociology. 2022;10:2701-14.
11. Maddi B. Law: From consent to obedience (An investigation of the relationship between consent, obedience, and law in John Locke's Second Treatise of Government). Political and International Approaches. 2022;4:153-78.
12. Jamshidian G. Anti-despotism in contemporary Islamic political thought (Comparing the views of Kavakebi and Na'ini). Barg Azin. 2019:95-110.
13. Tayefi S, Jamali A. Critical rereading of Esmaeil Shahroudi's poems with the approach of Wittfogel's oriental despotism and Katouzian's Iranian despotism. 2023:180-210.
14. Haft Baradaran A, Malaeke SH, Aqarap Parast M. Comparison of the political thought of Ayatollah Taleghani and Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi regarding despotism. Echo of Society in Political-Social Studies of Iranian History. 2024;2:216-30.
15. Kazemi SA. Political Tyranny and the Decline of the Islamic World from the Perspective of Kwakbi and Naini. Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Political and International Studies. 2024;1(2):47-69. doi: 10.62134/srqpis/v1.i2.khatamuni.3.
16. Hatami H, Rahimi H. Investigating the concept of despotism in the thought of Imam Khomeini (RA) and Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi. 2020:112-20.
17. Salmani M. A comparative analysis of the thought of Mohaqqeq Na'ini and his influence by Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi. 2023:135-58.
18. Arneil B. Colonialism studies in Iran: A critical rereading of John Locke's political philosophy and English colonialism in America: Based on the book John Locke and America: The defense of English colonialism. Research Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies; 2024. p. 310-45.
19. Kawakibi ARA. The Nature of Tyranny and the Devastating Results of Oppression: Hurst Publishers; 2021. 210-372 p.
20. Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community: Simon & Schuster; 2000. 320-48 p.
21. Amir AN, Rahman TA. Abd al-Rahman al-Kawākibī and the Political Vision of Islam. AL IMARAH: JURNAL PEMERINTAHAN DAN POLITIK ISLAM. 2023;8(2):275-92. doi: 10.29300/imr.v8i2.3476.
22. Snyder T. On tyranny: Goman; 2020. 216-40 p.
23. Baghdadi ASI. The Arabs and the Democratic Path: Attainable or Not? Contemporary Arab Affairs. 2022;15(3-4):78-93. doi: 10.1525/caa.2022.15.3-4.78.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahmood Valizadeh (Author); Ali Mohseni Moshtaghin; Mohammad Hasan Elahimanesh (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
