Comparative Study of Rent-Seeking in the Criminal Justice Systems of Iran and England with Reference to International Instruments
Keywords:
Rent, Rent-seeking, Justice, Discrimination, MonopolyAbstract
Rent-seeking, as one of the most long-standing forms of rights-violating conduct, has consistently been a major concern of nations, and combating it is regarded as a legitimate demand of societies. The criminal justice system in each country bears responsibility, on behalf of the legislature, for responding to this demand in order to safeguard rights, public interests, and the values endorsed by society. At the same time, the effective fulfillment of this responsibility requires the realization of numerous conditions, ranging from appropriate legislation to the political will of the governing authorities and the participation of the public, all of which may vary significantly from one country to another. The success or failure of criminal justice systems in combating rent-seeking and other forms of corruption undoubtedly depends on these conditions, and neglecting them leads to analytical distortions, the absolutization of responsibility, and ultimately the failure of the criminal justice system. Within the Iranian context, rent-seeking occupies a particularly prominent position among other forms of corruption in terms of its scale, characteristics, and the extent of the damage and losses it generates. Consequently, some commentators, without adequate attention to other contributing factors, identify the primary cause of the current situation as the absence of explicit criminalization of rent-seeking and the existence of opportunities for rent extraction. On this basis, they advocate for the enactment of a specific statute to combat it. However, various existing laws, under different titles and in a fragmented and sometimes indirect manner, already address the phenomenon of rent-seeking. Under these circumstances, in order to clarify the realities underlying the high level of rent-seeking in the country and to dispel pessimism and suspicion regarding the capacity of the criminal justice system, a comparative study of Iran’s criminal justice system with that of a country that has been successful in combating rent-seeking is considered essential. The outcome of such research will be enhanced awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of Iran’s criminal justice system and a clearer understanding of the causes of the elevated rate of rent-seeking.
Downloads
References
1. Bahrami Moghadam S. Coalition of rent-seekers, captured governance, and the emergence of crony capitalism in Egypt. Iranian Journal of International Politics. 2020;8(2).
2. Jafari M. Requirements of criminalization and prosecution of criminals in the law of economic activities. Journal of Economic Criminal Law Studies. 2016.
3. Khanali Pourvajargah S. Actors of Iran's criminal legislative process in the field of corruption and economic crimes. Selected Papers of the National Conference on Iran's Criminal Policy in the Field of Economic Crimes (2016). Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2018.
4. Fathi MR. Iran's criminal policy towards rent-seeking: Virtual Non-profit Institute of Noor Tuba, Criminal Law and Criminology; 2018.
5. Tabibian M. Economic rent as an economic obstacle. Planning and Development. 1993(Winter).
6. Mahdavi Pour A, Karimi M. The role of supervisory and control institutions in preventing administrative corruption. Journal of Economic Criminal Law Studies. 2016.
7. Alvani SM, Zarandi S, Arab Sorkhi A. Components of formulating the national anti-corruption strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2010(Spring & Summer):3-22.
8. Hashemi SMJ. Comparative study of the impact of democratic and independent supervisory institutions on reducing corruption with regard to Chapter Two of the 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. Selected Papers of the Conference on the United Nations Convention against Corruption: Achievements and Challenges. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2016.
9. Tabataba'i Motamani M, Afshari F, Asadi H. Abuse of discretionary power in English and Iranian judicial precedent and its comparison with jurisprudence and private law. Specialized Scientific Quarterly of Judgment (Ghezavat). 2015.
10. Sheikholeslami A. Criminal Policy of Iran and England in the Realm of Press Crimes. Tehran: Mizan; 2017.
11. Soleimani Asl S, editor Investigating the nature of rent-seeking and its consequent legal foundations "with a digression on the attitude presented by Imam Khomeini (RA)". The 8th International Conference on Jurisprudence, Law, Psychology and Educational Sciences in Iran and the Islamic World; 2024; Tehran.
12. Pourghasemi R, Moridi H, editors. Criminalization of informational rent-seeking in Iranian financial markets: Necessities and legal obstacles. The 9th International Conference on Jurisprudence, Law, Advocacy and Social Sciences in the Horizon of Iran 1404; 2025; Mashhad.
13. Ebrahimi S. Declaration and disclosure of economic crime. Selected Papers. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2018.
14. Rahimian N. Investigating economic corruption and ways to combat it. Economic Journal. 2014(9 & 10).
15. Fazlinejad SA, Ahmadian M. Rentier economy in Iran and ways out of it. Economic Journal. 2011;10(11 & 12).
16. Mehra N. The English Legal System. 2nd ed. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2010.
17. Yekrangi M. Limits of police powers in Iran and England: Shahid Beheshti University; 2006.
18. Malakooti N. Social punishments in Iranian and English law: Shahid Beheshti University; 2010.
19. Sabourpour M. The place of primary prevention of crime in England (Translation of Ken Pease's Criminology Treatise). Journal of Legal Justice. 2004(68).
20. Sabzevarinejad H. How punishment is determined in English courts (Translation of "A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure" by John Sprack). Journal of Excellence in Law. 2011;4(15).
21. Pradel J, Najafi Abrandabadi AH. History of Criminal Ideas. 1st ed. Tehran: SAMT Publications; 2009.
22. Mehra N. Punishment and how it is determined in the English criminal process (with emphasis on the functions of punishment). Journal of Legal Research. 2007(45).
23. Arabiyan B. Damages resulting from crime in Iranian and English law: Islamic Azad University, Shahroud Branch, Faculty of Literature and Humanities; 2014.
24. Javan Jafari A, Norouzi M, editors. Comparative study of "preventive detention" in Iranian and English criminal law2024.
25. Schultz HJ, Ghaffarifard A. History of England. Tehran: Negah Publications; 2015.
26. Khezri M, Renani M. Rent-seeking and its social costs. Economic Research Journal. 2017;52(2).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruhollah Saljooghi (Author); Mohammad Ali Mahdavi Sabet; Mohammad Ashouri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.