A Jurisprudential and Ethical Analysis of Spouses’ Right to Procreation and Population Growth

Authors

    Mostafa Rahimi Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Law, Se.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
    Morteza Barati * Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Law, Da.C,, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran mo-barati@iau.ac.ir
    Alireza Saberian Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Law, Se.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

Keywords:

Procreation, Istīlād, Islamic Jurisprudence, Marital Rights, Reproductive Ethics, Family Law

Abstract

Procreation occupies a central yet contested position in Islamic family law, situated between moral aspiration, legal structure, and personal autonomy. Contemporary demographic concerns and expanding reproductive technologies have intensified longstanding questions about whether procreation within marriage constitutes an enforceable obligation, a discretionary choice, or a legally protected right. This article offers an integrated jurisprudential and ethical analysis of spouses’ right to procreation (istīlād) within Imāmī Islamic jurisprudence. It first clarifies the conceptual distinction between ḥaqq (right) and ḥukm (rule), demonstrating that not every normative directive in Islamic law amounts to a personal entitlement. Building on this framework, the study examines classical and contemporary juristic positions on the attribution of reproductive rights to the husband or the wife, critically assessing arguments based on guardianship, bodily sovereignty, and analogies drawn from sexual permissibility. The analysis shows that unilateral models of reproductive authority are doctrinally weak and ethically problematic. The article then advances a relational understanding of procreation as a non-financial, personal, and reciprocal right embedded within the cooperative structure of marriage. Such a right is waivable under certain conditions, non-transferable, and resistant to coercive enforcement, yet ethically guided by considerations of responsibility, dignity, and mutual consent. The study further argues that procreation is not an essential element of marriage but a default implication that may be shaped by the spouses’ circumstances and agreements, with important distinctions between permanent and temporary marriage. By integrating fiqhī analysis with ethical reasoning, the article provides a coherent framework for addressing contemporary reproductive disputes in family law and bioethics while preserving the moral significance of childbearing and the dignity of spouses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Motahhari M. The System of Women's Rights in Islam. Tehran: Sadra Publications; 2007.

2. al-Muhaqqiq a-H. Shara'i al-Islam fi Masa'il al-Halal wa al-Haram. Qom: Mu'assasat al-Nashr al-Islami; 2001.

3. Zeraati MR. Reproductive Rights in Islamic Law. Qom: Research Institute for Islamic Studies; 2019.

4. Unesco. Ethics of Population Policies. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2015.

5. al-Jawahiri MH. Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shara'i al-Islam. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi; 1981.

6. Padela AI. Reproductive Ethics in Islamic Moral Thought. Journal of Islamic Ethics. 2017;1(2):145-68.

7. al-Tusi Mia-H. Al-Mabsut fi Fiqh al-Imamiyyah. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi; 1992.

8. al-Tusi Mia-H. Al-Khilaf. Qom: Islamic Publications Office; 1996.

9. Sachedina A. Islamic Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

10. al-Allamah a-H. Tadhkirat al-Fuqaha. Qom: Mu'assasat Aal al-Bayt; 2004.

11. al-Hakim M. Mustamsak al-Urwah al-Wuthqa. Najaf: Dar al-Kitab al-Islami; 1997.

12. al-Shahid a-T. Masalik al-Afham ila Tanqih Shara'i al-Islam. Qom: Islamic Publications Office; 2003.

13. al-Naraqi A. Mustanad al-Shi'a fi Ahkam al-Shari'a. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah; 1995.

14. Katouzian N. Family Law: Marriage and Divorce. Tehran: Entesharat Dadgostar; 2014.

15. Safaei SH. Personal Status Law in Iran. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2013.

16. Ghaly M. Islamic Ethics and the Genome Question. Leiden: Brill; 2019.

17. Emami A. Civil Law: Family Relations. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 2011.

18. Daar AS, Al Khitamy A. Bioethics for Clinicians: Islamic Perspective. BMJ. 2001;322(7288):384-7.

19. Langaroudi JJ. Terminology of Law. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh; 2008.

20. al-Shahid a-A. Al-Lum'ah al-Dimashqiyyah. Qom: Dar al-Fiqh; 1998.

21. al-Khoei Aa-Q. Mabani Takmilat al-Minhaj. Qom: Mu'assasat al-Imam al-Khoei; 2005.

22. An-Na'im AA. Islam and Human Rights: Beyond the Universality Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

23. al-Khoei Aa-Q. Mu'jam Rijal al-Hadith. Qom: Markaz Nashr al-Fiqh; 1992.

24. al-Sistani A. Minhaj al-Salihin. Qom: Imam Ali Foundation; 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

Submitted

2025-11-12

Revised

2026-02-05

Accepted

2026-02-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rahimi, M. ., Barati, M., & Saberian, A. . (2026). A Jurisprudential and Ethical Analysis of Spouses’ Right to Procreation and Population Growth. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-12. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/206

Similar Articles

61-70 of 180

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.