How the Seljuks of Iran Adapted the Theory of the Sultan as God’s Shadow (Ẓill Allāh) and the Abbasid Concept of the Caliph as God’s Vicegerent (Khalīfat Allāh), and Its Impact on the Consolidation of Their Position

Authors

    Davood Ghanbari Ph.D. student in Theology, Department of Islamic Studies, Tak.C., Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran
    Masood Mohammadi * Assistant Professor, Department of History, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran Masood.mohammadi93@cfu.ac.ir
    Ashraf Nayebzadeh Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Tak.C., Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran
https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.223

Keywords:

Sultan, Caliph, God’s Shadow, Seljuks, Legitimacy

Abstract

The Seljuk dynasty, in terms of territorial extent, political cohesion, and power, represents the most significant ruling dynasty of Iran after the advent of Islam, having established a formidable empire during the medieval period. In intellectual and bureaucratic domains, the Seljuks modeled their system of governance on the coherent and powerful states of pre-Islamic Iran, particularly the Sasanian Empire, and implemented Iranshahrī concepts and the notion of divine glory (farr-e īzadī) within their governmental structure. The principal architect of this form of governance in that period was Khwāja Niẓām al-Mulk, the powerful, prudent, and intellectually distinguished Iranian vizier, who succeeded in establishing a strong, orderly, and authoritative administrative system over a territory that was nearly equivalent to that of the Sasanian Empire at the height of its power. Within this context, the tension between the Iranshahrī ideology and the concept of divine glory and the theory of the sultan as God’s shadow—both derived from the political thought of ancient Iran, especially the Sasanian tradition—and the spiritual authority of the Abbasid caliphs, whose legitimacy was believed to derive from God and the Prophet and whom the Seljuks formally regarded themselves as bound to obey, provided the impetus for the present study. Accordingly, this research examines the manner in which these two political-theological concepts were reconciled and the extent of their influence on Seljuk political and governmental interactions. The findings indicate that the Seljuks, under the leadership of their powerful vizier Niẓām al-Mulk, while implementing Iranshahrī thought, the doctrine of divine glory, and the principle of the sultan’s absolute sovereignty within the Seljuk governmental structure, outwardly expressed loyalty to the caliph in order to benefit from his spiritual influence among the populace. In practice, however, they themselves made and executed all major political and military decisions and at times even intervened in the appointment and dismissal of the caliph’s ministers and officials, effectively imposing their own views upon the caliph. The present study employs a descriptive–analytical method to investigate how the Seljuks of Iran adapted the theory of the sultan as God’s shadow and the Abbasid concept of the caliph as God’s vicegerent, and to assess the impact of this adaptation on the consolidation of their political position.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Boyle JA, Anousheh H. The Cambridge History of Iran (From the Saljuqs to the Fall of the Ilkhanids). Tehran: Amirkabir; 1987.

2. Ibn al-Athir E, Halat A. The Complete History. Tehran: Elmi Publications; 1973.

3. Lambton AKS, Azhand Y. Continuity and Change in Medieval Persia. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 1993.

4. Tabatabaei J. Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk: A Discourse on the Cultural Continuity of Iran. 3rd ed. Tehran: Minuye Kherad; 2020.

5. Klausner CL, Azhand Y. The Seljuk Vizierate: A Study of Civil Administration. Tehran: Amirkabir; 1984.

6. Dalir N. The discourse of the Caliphate and the Sultanate in Siyar al-Mulk. Journal of Islamic History Studies. 2009;1(4).

7. Karimi A. Seljuk relations with the Abbasid Caliphate (With emphasis on the era of Sultan Mas'ud Seljuk). Roshd History Education Journal. 2010;10(3).

8. Nizam al-Mulk T. The Book of Government (Siyasatnama). Tehran: Zovvar; 1955.

9. Ahmadvand S, Nozari ME, Jebraeili N. Understanding the transformation of the Myth of Divine Glory (Farr-e Izadi); From the Sassanid Era to the Islamic Period. Social History Studies. 2016;6(1):1-30.

10. Pourdavoud I. The Yashts. Tehran: Asatir; 1998.

11. Razi H. Iranian Religion and Culture Before the Zoroastrian Era. Tehran: Sokhan; 2003.

12. Ibn Khaldun A, Ayati A. History of Ibn Khaldun. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies; 2009.

13. Nishapuri Z. Seljuqnama. Tehran: Kalaleh Khavar; 1953.

14. Ravandi M. Rahat al-Sudur wa Ayat al-Sudur. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi; 1984.

15. Kanpuri MA, Tabatabaei SM. The Life of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk. Tehran: Noor Monthly; 1971.

16. Iqbal Ashtiani A. The Vizierate during the Reign of the Great Seljuq Sultans. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 1953.

17. Sarafrazi A. The impact of Siyasatnama on the structure of the Seljuk government. Iranian and Islamic Historical Researches. 2013(13).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Submitted

2025-11-03

Revised

2026-01-20

Accepted

2026-02-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ghanbari , D., Mohammadi, M., & Nayebzadeh, A. (2026). How the Seljuks of Iran Adapted the Theory of the Sultan as God’s Shadow (Ẓill Allāh) and the Abbasid Concept of the Caliph as God’s Vicegerent (Khalīfat Allāh), and Its Impact on the Consolidation of Their Position. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.223

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.