Analysis of the Differences in Criminal Liability of Physicians in Cosmetic Surgery Compared to Other Types of Surgery

Authors

    Mahdi Forouzesh * Associate Professor in Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran forouzeshiran@gmail.com
    Parviz Mohammadnejad Assistant Professor in Department of Law, ST.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Amin Golriz Assistant Professor in Department of Law, ST.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Jamshid Mousavi PhD Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Law, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Criminal liability, Cosmetic surgery, Medical negligence, Physician responsibility, Medical law, Surgical liability, Informed consent, Therapeutic surgery

Abstract

Criminal liability in medical practice represents a critical legal mechanism designed to ensure accountability and protect patient safety, particularly in surgical interventions that involve inherent risks to bodily integrity. While criminal liability principles apply to all physicians, cosmetic surgery presents unique legal challenges due to its elective nature, absence of therapeutic necessity, and heightened patient expectations. Unlike therapeutic and reconstructive surgeries, which are performed to treat disease, restore function, or prevent deterioration of health, cosmetic procedures are undertaken voluntarily to improve physical appearance. This distinction fundamentally affects the legal justification for surgical intervention, the standard of professional care required, and the allocation of legal responsibility. The present study aims to analyze and explain the differences in criminal liability of physicians in cosmetic surgery compared to other types of surgical procedures. This research adopts a doctrinal and analytical legal method, examining criminal law principles, medical law standards, and professional obligations governing surgical practice. The findings indicate that cosmetic surgeons face greater exposure to criminal liability due to the lack of medical necessity, stricter standards of care, increased importance of informed consent, and heightened judicial scrutiny in cases involving adverse outcomes. In cosmetic surgery, informed consent plays a decisive role in establishing legal justification, yet it does not eliminate liability in cases of negligence, lack of competence, or violation of professional standards. Furthermore, the allocation of legal risk in cosmetic surgery shifts more heavily toward the physician, as the elective nature of the procedure removes the protective justification associated with therapeutic necessity. The study concludes that cosmetic surgery represents a legally sensitive area of medical practice, requiring physicians to exercise exceptional professional diligence, ensure full compliance with legal and ethical standards, and maintain strict adherence to professional competence in order to avoid criminal liability and protect patient rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ashworth A. Principles of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

2. Ardabili MA. General Criminal Law (Vol. 1). Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2014.

3. Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.

4. Ormerod D, Laird K. Smith and Hogan's Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

5. World Medical A. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: World Medical Association; 2013.

6. Abbasi M. Medical Negligence and Legal Responsibility. Iranian Journal of Medical Law. 2012;6(21):45-72.

7. Studdert DM. Medical Malpractice Law and Patient Safety. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;354(19):2024-33.

8. Brazier M, Cave E. Medicine, Patients and the Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2016.

9. Gillette R. Cosmetic Surgery and Legal Responsibility. Journal of Law and Medicine. 2011;18(4):745-62.

10. Faunce T. Cosmetic Surgery and Medical Law. Medical Journal of Australia. 2007;187(7):404-6.

11. Hosseini Tabar M, Karami A. Legal Analysis of Cosmetic Surgery in Iran. Journal of Health Law. 2016;10(1):25-49.

12. Montgomery J. Health Care Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.

13. McLean S. Autonomy, Consent and the Law. London: Routledge; 2013.

14. Kennedy I, Grubb A. Medical Law: Text and Materials. London: Butterworths; 2000.

15. Clarkson CMV, Keating H. Criminal Law: Text and Materials. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2010.

16. Parsania H. Legal Nature of Cosmetic Surgery. Medical Law Quarterly. 2006;3(2):55-75.

17. Mirzaei M. Medical Criminal Liability in Iranian Law. Tehran: Majd Publishing; 2007.

18. Iranian Medical C. Medical Professional Regulations. Tehran: Iranian Medical Council; 2007.

19. Zeraat A. General Criminal Law. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 2000.

20. Taheri H. Civil Liability. Tehran: SAMT Publishing; 2005.

21. Abbasian H. Criminal Liability of Physicians in Iranian Law. Journal of Criminal Law Studies. 2022;14(2):45-68.

22. Goldoozian I. General Criminal Law. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 1993.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2025-11-12

Revised

2026-02-24

Accepted

2026-02-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Forouzesh, M., Mohammadnejad, P. ., Golriz, A. ., & Mousavi, J. . (2026). Analysis of the Differences in Criminal Liability of Physicians in Cosmetic Surgery Compared to Other Types of Surgery. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-18. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/252

Similar Articles

61-70 of 151

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.