The Function of Standardized Contracts in Ensuring Transparency and Legal Security in Immovable Property Transactions (A Critical Analysis)

Authors

    Mostafa Sarkheil Department of Public Law, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
    Hojjatollah Ebrahimiyan * Department of Public Law, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran ebrahimian@iau.ac.ir
    Mohammad Ali Kafaeifar Department of Public International Law, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

Keywords:

Standardized contracts, Immovable property transactions, Legal security, Contractual transparency, Transactional justice

Abstract

The phenomenon of standardized contracts in immovable property transactions represents one of the prominent manifestations of transformation within the private law system and the transition from the absolute dominance of individual autonomy toward institutional governmental regulation in transactional relations. These contracts are designed with the objective of harmonizing contractual provisions, reducing ambiguity, and enhancing predictability in transactional relationships. Within the framework of the Law on Mandatory Official Registration of Immovable Property Transactions (enacted in 2024), they function as an effective instrument for ensuring transparency and legal security. At the same time, although contractual standardization contributes to acceleration and efficiency within the registration system, it raises fundamental challenges from the perspective of contractual justice and the protection of the weaker party’s autonomy of will. Employing a descriptive–analytical approach grounded in comparative examination, the present study explains the nature, functions, and limits of the juristic and legal legitimacy of standardized contracts in immovable property transactions and demonstrates that the legitimacy of such contractual frameworks depends upon compliance with principles of transparency, procedural justice, and the public interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Williamson OE. The economic institutions of capitalism: Free Press; 1985.

2. Collins H. Regulating contracts: Oxford University Press; 1999.

3. Katouzian N. Civil Law: General Rules of Contracts (Vol. 1). Tehran: Enteshar Co.; 2009.

4. Hosseini A. Analysis of the Jurisprudential-Legal Foundations of the Document and Property Registration System in Iranian Law. 1st ed. Tehran: Ganje Danesh Publications; 2024.

5. Rawls J. A theory of justice: Harvard University Press; 1971.

6. Lotfi H. The Basis of Government Intervention in Contracts: Corrective or Distributive Justice? Public Law Studies Quarterly. 2018;48(3):547-67.

7. Alijani M, Javaherkalam MH. Legal and Economic Analysis of the Provisions of Article One of the Law on Mandatory Official Registration of Real Estate Transactions. Encyclopedia of Economic Law. 2024;31(26):162-84.

8. Dadbakhsh H, editor Analysis and Critique of the Law on Mandatory Official Registration of Real Estate Transactions: Legal, Jurisprudential, and Comparative Dimensions2024.

9. Carbonnier J. Droit civil: Presses Universitaires de France; 2004.

10. Atiyah PS. The rise and fall of freedom of contract: Oxford University Press; 1980.

11. Shavell S. Foundations of economic analysis of law: Harvard University Press; 2004.

12. Schmidt K. German property law: Springer; 2020.

13. Rahpeyk H. Civil Law (Contract Law). 4th ed. Tehran: Khorsandi Publications; 2019.

14. Safai SH. Introductory Course of Civil Law Volume Two (General Rules of Contracts). Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2011.

15. Emami SH. Civil Law. Tehran: Islamiyeh Publications; 2013.

16. Llewellyn K. The common law tradition: Deciding appeals: Little, Brown and Company; 1960.

17. Carbonnier J. Droit civil - Les biens: PUF; 2019.

18. Ghasemi Hamed A. Good Faith in Contract: The Basis of the Obligation to Honesty and the Obligation to Cooperate in French Law. Journal of Legal Research. 2007(46):99-128.

19. Coase RH. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 1960;3(1):1-44.

20. North DC. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

21. Bennett R. Property rights and land registration systems: A global perspective: Springer; 2016.

22. Jafari Langroudi MJ. Registration Law (Real Estate Registration). 9th ed. Tehran: Ganje Danesh Publications; 2023.

23. Karimi A, Alipour Ghoushchi S. Incompatibility of the Concept of Contractual Balance with the Traditional or Liberal Theory of Contracts. Private Law Studies Quarterly. 2021;51(1):97-112.

24. Abedi Sarasia A. The Rule of Mastery (Taslit) and Its Role in Validating Modern Contracts (With a Look at the Thoughts of Imam Khomeini). Matin Research Journal. 2017;19(75):129-54.

25. Jafari Langroudi MJ. Civil Law Course: Law of Obligations. 4th ed. Tehran: Ganje Danesh; 2017.

26. Ghasemzadeh SM. Civil Law: Principles of Contracts and Obligations. 17th ed. Tehran: Dadgostar Publications; 2023.

27. Sicoria C. A Comparative Study of the Protection of the Weaker Party to a Contract in Italy and the Doctrine of Unconscionability in the United States (Trans. Sayyid Jafar Kazempour). Journal of Justice Administration Law. 2010;74(71):139-80.

28. Tabatabaei Hesari N. A Critical Perspective on the Approaches of the Law on Mandatory Official Registration of Real Estate Transactions in Resolving Real Estate Transaction Challenges. Journal of Justice Administration Law. 2024;88(128):1-32.

29. Glaeser EL, Shleifer A. Legal origins. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2002;117(4):1193-229.

30. Amini M, Khodadad J. Evaluation of the "Mandatory Registration of Real Estate Transactions Bill" with a Comparative Approach. Judiciary Research Institute. 2021;1(1):181-213.

31. Williamson I, Enemark S, Wallace J, Rajabifard A. Land administration for sustainable development: ESRI Press; 2010.

32. Bebchuk LA, Shavell S. The economic analysis of contract law. Harvard Law Review. 1994;107(7):1611-73.

33. Rahmani S. Economic Analysis of Mandatory Registration of Documents and Transactions: Shahr-e Danesh Publications; 2023.

34. Rose-Ackerman S. The law and economics of development: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

35. Hart HLA. The concept of law: Oxford University Press; 1961.

36. Tousi A, Kashani J. Economic Analysis of Government Legal Interventions in Rental Relationships Based on the Idea of Market Efficiency and Its Failure. Private Law Research Quarterly. 2019;8(29):159-91.

37. Shahidi M. Effects of Contracts and Obligations. Tehran: Majd Publications; 2012.

38. Bigdeli A. Sovereignty of Will in Imami Jurisprudence, Romano-Germanic System, and Iranian Law: A Foundational-Philosophical Introduction. Islamic Law Research Journal. 2015;16(1):125-50.

39. Naeini MH. The Desire of the Student in the Explanation of Al-Makasib. Qom: Islamic Publications; 1995.

40. Ansari SM. Al-Makasib. Qom: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyah Publications; 1997.

41. Khomeini I. Tahrir al-Wasilah. Qom: Institute for Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works; 2005.

42. Makarem Shirazi N. Lights of Jurisprudence in the Rules of Transactions. Qom: Dar al-Fikr; 2021.

43. Karimian Ravandi M, Mohammadi G. Realization of Economic Justice Through Intervention in Contracts. Scientific Journal of Civil Law Knowledge. 2020;9(2):11-22.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2025-10-27

Revised

2026-02-21

Accepted

2026-02-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sarkheil, M., Ebrahimiyan, H., & Kafaeifar, M. A. . (2026). The Function of Standardized Contracts in Ensuring Transparency and Legal Security in Immovable Property Transactions (A Critical Analysis). Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-16. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/275

Similar Articles

121-130 of 163

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.