The Role of Think Tanks in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11

Authors

    Mohammad Qasim Erfani PhD. Candidate, Department of International Relations, CT.C., Azad Islamic University, Tehran, Iran.
    Reza Jallali * Department of International Relations, , CT.C., Azad Islamic University, Tehran, Iran. Rez.jalali@iau.ctb.ac.ir
    Sayed Ali Tabatabaie Panah Department of International Relations, CT.C., Azad Islamic University, Tehran, Iran.
    Ardeshir Sannaie Department of International Relations, CT.C., Azad Islamic University, Tehran, Iran.

Keywords:

  Foreign policy, think tanks, United States, September 11, revolving door, pluralism, public opinion mobilization

Abstract

Think tanks constitute a significant phenomenon in the processes of domestic and foreign policymaking in the United States. Although political developments in our country, particularly over the past two decades, have been influenced by U.S. foreign policy, awareness of the role of think tanks in shaping U.S. foreign policy remains limited even among our elites. Therefore, in order to achieve a deeper understanding of the complex layers of policymaking in this country, it is necessary to expand the body of knowledge and literature related to think tanks and to gain a more precise understanding of their functions. The central question of this article is: what role have U.S. think tanks played in shaping the country’s foreign policy after September 11? To answer this question, a descriptive-analytical method has been employed. Data were collected using a library-based approach, with a focus on primary and secondary sources published in English. The theoretical framework of pluralism and the concept of the revolving door provide appropriate analytical tools for explaining and analyzing how think tanks operate within the domain of foreign policymaking. The findings indicate that think tanks, by supplying personnel to governmental bodies, participating in media debates, and through the presence of their affiliated figures in the September 11 Commission, have played a highly significant role in directing and prioritizing U.S. foreign policy in the post-September 11 era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Troy T. Devaluing the Think Tank. National Affairs. 2012.

2. McGann JG. Global Go to Think Tank Index Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2021.

3. Abelson DE. Think Tanks and U.S. foreign policy: an historical perspective. An electronic journal of the US department of state. 2002;7.

4. Hass RN. Think Tanks and U.S. Foreign Policy: a policy-maker’s perspective. US Foreign Policy Agenda: an electronic journal of the US department of state. 2002;7.

5. McGann JG. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute, 2005.

6. Weaver K. The changing world of Think Tanks. PS: Political Science and Politics. 1989;22(3).

7. The White House. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington: 2006.

8. The White House. National Security Strategy. Washington: 2010.

9. Burrows M. Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Scholars, Think Tanks, and Influence on Policymaking. 2024.

10. McGann JG. The Fifth Estate: Think Tanks, Public Policy, and Governance. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2016.

11. Rich A, Weaver K. Think Tanks in the political system of the United States. Think Tanks in Policy Making – Do They Matter? Briefing Paper Special Issue. 2011.

12. McGann JG. Global Go to Think Tank Index Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2007.

13. Parmar I. Think Tanks and Power in Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.

14. Gern A. Postmodernism. 2003.

15. Chance A. Think Tanks in the United States; Activities, Agendas, and Influence. Washington, DC: Institute for China-America Studies, 2016.

16. Abelson DE. Rethinking the Role and Influence of U.S. Defense and Foreign Policy Think Tanks. 2024.

17. Thrall AT, Goepner E. Step Back: Lessons for U.S. Foreign Policy from the Failed War on Terror. CATO Institute, 2017.

18. Biegon R, Watts TFA. Beyond the neoconservative legacy in American counterterrorism policy: from George W. Bush to forever war. International Politics. 2023.

19. Kerry JF. Exploring three strategies for Afghanistan. Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 2009.

20. Bravender R. Think tank new ‘training ground’ for Obama’s green team. EE News. 2015.

21. The 9/11 Commission. Report, Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attack Upon the United States, Executive Summary. 2004.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Erfani , M. Q. ., Jallali, R., Tabatabaie Panah , . . S. A. ., & Sannaie, A. . (2026). The Role of Think Tanks in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-14. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/301

Similar Articles

1-10 of 173

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.