The Deobandi Movement and the Reproduction of Political-Security Power in Pakistan

Authors

    Fazel Rahman Faizi Department of Political Science, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
    Ali Asghar Davoudi * Department of Political Science, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran Ali.Davoudi@iau.ac.ir
    Ahmad Javanshiri Department of Political Science, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Keywords:

Deobandi Movement, Reproduction of Political-Security Power, Religion-State Relations, Political Islam in Pakistan, Religious Networks and Power

Abstract

This article examines the role of the Deobandi movement in the reproduction of political-security power in Pakistan by moving beyond reductionist interpretations. The central question is through which institutional, discursive, and network-based mechanisms the Deobandi movement participates in processes of power reproduction. The theoretical framework is grounded in the concept of “power reproduction” and is formulated through the integration of historical institutionalism, symbolic capital theory, and discursive approaches to power. The research adopts a qualitative methodology based on historical-institutional analysis and discourse analysis, encompassing religious-political texts, educational literature, and the discourses of religious and political elites. The findings indicate that the network of religious seminaries, the authority of the ulama, and religious symbolic capital have provided an institutional infrastructure for social and political influence. In dynamic interaction with the state and security institutions, these elements have contributed to the production of legitimacy, the framing of threats, and social mobilization, without being reducible to mere instruments of the state. The internal heterogeneity of the movement further suggests that its connections with politics and jihadism are less inherent than they are products of specific historical and geopolitical contexts. The article concludes that security in Pakistan is not a purely material phenomenon but rather a social and discursive construct shaped through the interaction between the state and religious networks. Therefore, analyses of politics and security in Pakistan remain incomplete without considering the structural role of religious actors. By conceptualizing religion as a source of meaning, legitimacy, and mobilization, this study contributes to the literature on political Islam and security studies in postcolonial societies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review. 2000;94(2):251-67.

2. Mahoney J, Thelen K. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

3. Bashiriyeh H. Political Sociology: The Role of Social Forces in Political Life. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 2010.

4. Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon; 1972.

5. Schmidt VA. Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science. 2008;11:303-26.

6. Tajik M. Political Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 2004.

7. Seyf AA. Research Methods in Educational and Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Doran; 2011.

8. Bourdieu P. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991.

9. Bourdieu P, Passeron J-C. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage; 1977.

10. Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon; 1980.

11. Fox J. A World Survey of Religion and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

12. Mottaghi E. National Security and Foreign Policy. Tehran: Qomes; 2012.

13. Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies. 1996;44(5):936-57.

14. Leylaz S. Discourse and Politics in Iran. Tehran: Sales Publishing; 2015.

15. Sariolghalam M. Rationality and Development in Iran. Tehran: Center for Scientific Research; 2011.

16. Haynes J. An Introduction to Religion and Politics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013.

17. Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 1998.

18. Vaezi A. Theories of Security. Tehran: SAMT; 2011.

19. Dehghani Firouzabadi SJ. National Security and the International System. Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies; 2009.

20. Ghavam A. Principles of Foreign Policy and International Politics. Tehran: SAMT; 2012.

21. Kinnvall C. Globalization and religious nationalism. Political Psychology. 2004;25(5):741-67.

22. Khalili M. Security and Religious Identity. Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies; 2014.

23. Weber M. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1978.

24. Jalaeipour H. Social Movements in Iran. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 2002.

25. Hajiani E. Religion and Political Legitimacy. Tehran: Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought; 2010.

26. Ayoob M. Inequality and theorizing in international relations: The case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review. 2002;4(3):27-48.

27. Casanova J. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.

28. Ayoob M. The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 1995.

29. Migdal JS. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

30. Kachouian H. Theories of the State in Political Sociology. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 2005.

31. Mowthaghi A. State and Development in Iran. Tehran: Qomes; 2003.

32. Balzacq T. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. London: Routledge; 2011.

33. Metcalf BD. Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1982.

34. Zargarinejad G. History of Political and Social Developments in Iran and India during the Colonial Period. Tehran: SAMT; 2007.

35. Ahmadi A. Intellectual Transformations in the Contemporary Islamic World. Tehran: SAMT; 2011.

36. Nasiri A. Religious Schools in the Indian Subcontinent. Tehran: University of Tehran; 2015.

37. Zaman MQ. The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.

38. Nozari M. Political Islam in Pakistan. Tehran: Institute for Regional Studies; 2013.

39. Nasr SH. Islamic Sufism. Tehran: Hekmat; 2004.

40. Rabbani M. Religious Movements in Pakistani Politics. Tehran: Center for Strategic Studies; 2016.

41. Rashid A. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2000.

42. Izadi H. Religious Schools and Regional Security. Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies; 2017.

43. Nasr SVR. Islamic Leviathan: Islam and the Making of State Power. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

44. Nasr SVR. The Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution: The Jamaʿat-i Islami of Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1994.

45. Jalal A. Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2008.

46. Haqqani H. Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; 2005.

47. Shah A. The Army and Democracy: Military Politics in Pakistan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2014.

48. Naghizadeh A. Fundamentals of Political Science. Tehran: SAMT; 2011.

49. Nasr SH. Shia and Sunni in the Islamic World: History and Politics. Tehran: Hekmat; 2007.

Downloads

Published

2027-05-01

Submitted

2026-03-11

Revised

2026-06-16

Accepted

2026-06-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rahman Faizi , F. ., Davoudi, A. A., & Javanshiri , A. . (2027). The Deobandi Movement and the Reproduction of Political-Security Power in Pakistan. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-23. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/362

Similar Articles

1-10 of 199

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.