Narratives of Electoral Disenfranchisement in Marginalized Populations
Keywords:
Electoral disenfranchisement, marginalized populations, narrative inquiry, political exclusion, qualitative research, democratic participation, IranAbstract
This study aims to explore the lived experiences of electoral disenfranchisement among marginalized populations in Tehran, focusing on how structural, psychological, and cultural mechanisms shape their exclusion from political participation. Adopting a qualitative narrative inquiry approach, this research involved semi-structured interviews with 17 participants from socioeconomically and politically marginalized communities in Tehran. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure variation in gender, ethnicity, and residential status. Interviews were conducted in Persian and transcribed verbatim. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Thematic narrative analysis was employed to analyze the transcripts using NVivo 12 software. Codes were developed inductively and organized into themes and subthemes that captured the participants' perceptions and experiences of disenfranchisement. Three main themes emerged from the data: (1) Structural barriers to participation, including bureaucratic obstacles, geographic isolation, legal disqualification, and digital exclusion; (2) Psychological and social disengagement, such as fear of reprisal, political disillusionment, and community apathy; and (3) Resistance and agency, which encompassed informal political organizing, symbolic acts of voting, and peer civic education. Participants reported feeling both institutionally excluded and internally alienated, but many also demonstrated resilience and political creativity through alternative forms of engagement. Electoral disenfranchisement in marginalized populations is a multidimensional phenomenon shaped by systemic exclusion, internalized marginality, and restricted civic infrastructure. Despite these barriers, individuals continue to assert political agency through informal and symbolic means. Policymakers must address both structural and psychosocial dimensions of exclusion to foster inclusive democratic participation and rebuild institutional trust in vulnerable communities.
Downloads
References
Alaaldin, R. (2021). Authoritarian elections and the paradox of participation: Repression, co-optation, and control. Middle East Policy, 28(1), 42–53.
Bayat, A. (2010). Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford University Press.
Brennan Center for Justice. (2021). Voting laws roundup. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-2021
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Cruikshank, B. (1999). The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Cornell University Press.
Foster, M. D. (1981). The effects of discrimination on personal efficacy and motivation. Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), 55–74.
Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Polity Press.
Howard, M. M. (2017). The causes and consequences of low civic engagement in marginalized communities. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 261–279.
Human Rights Watch. (2017). Iran: Ethnic discrimination and electoral exclusion. https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/05/17/iran-ethnic-discrimination
Lerman, A. E., & Weaver, V. M. (2014). Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. University of Chicago Press.
López, N., & Espino, R. (2017). Disenfranchised by design: Electoral exclusion and Latino voters in the U.S. Southwest. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(1), 67–82.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. SAGE Publications.
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(1), 203–218.
Vakil, S. (2018). Iran and the politics of resistance: Fragmented opposition in the Islamic Republic. Chatham House Report.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.