The West’s Self-Perceived Mission: Bernard Lewis’s Views on Western Saviorism

Authors

    Milad Yari PhD Student, Department of Political Science, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Ahmad Bakhshayeshiardestani * Department of Political Thought, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ahm.bakhshayeshiardestani@iauctb.ac.ir
    Mohammad Tohidfam Department of Political Science, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Bernard Lewis, Feyerabend, Orientalism, Islam, West, mission of the West

Abstract

The confrontation and rivalry between the Western world and the Islamic world is not a new phenomenon; these two civilizations have each, at different points in history, sought to demonstrate their superiority over the other. Following the beginning of the Renaissance movement in the West, the balance gradually shifted in favor of the West. Through fundamental transformations at various levels, Western societies entered the path of development and progress. Since the West’s advancement over the East, various Orientalists have attempted to explain the reasons for this development and to offer prescriptions regarding how to manage the new conditions and how to deal with a world perceived as more backward. One of these thinkers is Bernard Lewis. He attributes the responsibility for Muslims’ backwardness to Muslims themselves and, in doing so, attempts to assign a mission to the West for reforming the Islamic world. The main objective of this article is to determine, first, the nature of the mission that Lewis assigns to the West; and second, the theoretical and epistemological foundations on which Lewis’s view is based, as well as whether these foundations are firmly established. According to the findings of this article, numerous epistemological objections can be raised against Bernard Lewis’s view of the “mission of the West.” Drawing on Feyerabend’s theories, Lewis’s views are understood not as knowledge about Islam and Islamic societies, but rather as a form of ideology placed in the service of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Said E. The Clash of Civilizations: Islam and the West. Gavahi A, editor. Tehran: Islamic Culture Publishing Office; 2006.

2. Lewis B. The Clash of Cultures. Oveysi B, editor. Tehran: Forouzan Rooz Publishing and Research; 2001.

3. Abrahamian E. The US media, Huntington and September 11. Third World Quarterly. 2003;24(3).

4. Pazouki S. Descartes and modernity. Philosophical Quarterly. 2000(1).

5. Ahmadi B. The Enigma of Modernity. Tehran: Markaz Publishing; 1998.

6. Chalmers AF. What Is This Thing Called Science? Zibakalam S, editor. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company; 1995.

7. Feyerabend P. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books; 1975.

8. Feyerabend P. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso; 1987.

9. Feyerabend P. Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

10. Feyerabend P. How to defend society against science. Arghanoon. 1994(1).

11. Feyerabend P. Problems of Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981.

12. Feyerabend P. Against Method. 4th ed: Verso; 2010.

13. Lewis B. The Middle East: Two Thousand Years of History from the Rise of Christianity to the Present Day. Kamshad H, editor. Tehran: Ney; 2002.

14. Lewis B. The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror: Modern Library; 2003.

15. Feyerabend P. Science in a Free Society: New Left Books; 1978.

16. Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 6th ed: SAGE Publications; 2018.

17. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry: SAGE Publications; 1985.

18. Bicharanloo A. Representation of Iran and Islam in Hollywood. Tehran: Research Institute of Culture, Art and Communication; 2012.

19. Lewis B. The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam. Khakbaz Mohseni H, editor. Tehran: Ketab-e Zaman Publications; 2004.

20. Motahhari M. Imamate and Leadership. Qom: Sadra Publications; 1993.

21. Faimau G. The conflictual model of analysis in studies on the media representation of Islam and Muslims: A critical review. Sociology Compass. 2015;9(5).

22. Lewis B. The Political Language of Islam. Behroozlak G, editor. Qom: Islamic Publications of Qom Seminary; 1999.

23. Lewis B. Istanbul and the Civilization of the Ottoman Empire. Bahar M, editor. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company; 1986.

Downloads

Published

2027-09-01

Submitted

2026-04-08

Revised

2026-07-02

Accepted

2026-07-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yari, M. ., Bakhshayeshiardestani, A., & Tohidfam, M. . (2027). The West’s Self-Perceived Mission: Bernard Lewis’s Views on Western Saviorism. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-19. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/382

Similar Articles

31-40 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.