The Asianization of the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: A Scenario of the Opportunities and Threats of the Eastward Pivot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.399Keywords:
Asianization, foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, futures studies, scenario planning, Look East policyAbstract
The concept of Asianization in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran can be analyzed as an alternative strategy for reducing dependence on Western-centric structures amid transformations in the international order and intensifying geopolitical competition. The dissertation on which this study draws emphasizes that this approach seeks to establish “a new structure and a new order without the participation of the West and the United States” by utilizing Asia’s economic, political, and security capacities. Within this framework, Iranian foreign policy seeks, on the one hand, to expand its strategic room for maneuver by strengthening relations with East Asia and other Asian actors and, on the other hand, to balance against Western pressure, sanctions, and the security alliances maintained by certain Asian states with the United States. Drawing on Peter Schwartz’s eight-step scenario-planning model, this study examines plausible scenarios concerning the effects of Asianization on the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The findings indicate that this approach simultaneously presents opportunities, including access to extensive economic markets and the enhancement of Iran’s regional role, as well as threats, such as the dependence of certain Asian powers on the West and their alignment with anti-Iranian security arrangements. Accordingly, the central question of this article is what function Asianization serves in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in confronting Western and U.S. hegemony and how it may contribute to the formation of a new East-oriented discourse.
Downloads
References
1. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics: Addison-Wesley; 1979.
2. Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics: W. W. Norton; 2001.
3. Mahbubani K. The New Asian Hemisphere: PublicAffairs; 2008.
4. Shambaugh D. China Goes Global: Oxford University Press; 2013.
5. Pape R. Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security. 2005.
6. Paul TV. Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy. International Security. 2005.
7. Keohane R. After Hegemony: Princeton University Press; 1984.
8. Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
9. Haass R. The Age of Nonpolarity. Foreign Affairs. 2008.
10. Kazemi AA. Transformations of the International System and Global Politics. Tehran: Ghomes; 2009.
11. Ghavam A. Principles of Foreign Policy and International Politics. Tehran: SAMT; 2012.
12. Dehghani Firouzabadi SJ. Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: SAMT; 2011.
13. Kaplan R. The Revenge of Geography: Random House; 2012.
14. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard. New York: Basic Books; 1997.
15. Ikenberry GJ. Liberal Leviathan: Princeton University Press; 2011.
16. Schwartz P. The Art of the Long View. New York: Doubleday; 1991.
17. Mottaghi E. Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the International System. Tehran: Ghomes; 2012.
18. Sariolghalam M. Rationality and the Future of Iran's Development. Tehran: Center for Scientific Research and Middle East Strategic Studies; 2013.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahdi khodarahimibougar (Author); Hamidreza Haghighat; Abdolamir Jofri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.