Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy 3115-7505 In Press 2027 11 01 The Role of Economic Crises in the Weakening of the Samanid State The Role of Economic Crises in the Weakening of the Samanid State 1 18 EN Journal Article 2026 07 19 <p>The Samanid state (874–999 CE) was one of the most significant Iranian dynasties in Central Asia and Khorasan. By relying on agricultural prosperity, control over major trade routes, and an efficient administrative system, it succeeded in establishing nearly a century of political and cultural stability. Nevertheless, during the final decades of the tenth century, a combination of economic crises—including declining fiscal revenues, agricultural recession, monetary instability, the spread of administrative corruption, and rising military expenditures—gradually undermined the foundations of Samanid power. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and drawing on primary sources such as The History of Bukhara, Tajārib al-Umam, and Zayn al-Akhbār, this article demonstrates that the economic crisis was not an independent cause but rather an “accelerating factor” that, together with court rivalries and military pressure from the Ghaznavids and Turkic tribes, hastened the process of the Samanids’ political collapse. The findings indicate that the government’s inability to pay the stipends of Turkic military slaves, the depreciation of coinage, and the deterioration of Transoxiana’s irrigation network were the most significant manifestations of the economic crisis, contributing to the disintegration of central authority and facilitating the rise of rival powers such as the Ghaznavids. The results further demonstrate that the Samanid economic crisis was not an accidental phenomenon but the outcome of a series of long-term structural pressures that ultimately generated a cycle of economic and political instability. The collapse of the Samanid state may therefore be regarded as a prominent example of the structural decline of a premodern state whose disintegration was facilitated by the concurrence of fiscal crisis, elite competition, and institutional weakness.</p> https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/download/397/442