Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy 3115-7505 2 Serial Number 7 2024 07 01 Balancing Security and Rights: Legal Narratives in Counterterrorism Policy Balancing Security and Rights: Legal Narratives in Counterterrorism Policy 37 45 EN Journal Article 2024 05 09 <p>This study aims to explore how legal professionals construct, justify, and critique counterterrorism policies in relation to individual rights and institutional legitimacy within a securitized legal context. The research employed a qualitative methodology grounded in a phenomenological approach to examine the lived experiences and interpretive narratives of legal practitioners, policy experts, and rights advocates based in Tehran. Sixteen participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure relevance to the subject of counterterrorism legislation and rights discourse. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, each lasting between 45 and 70 minutes, and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis with the aid of NVivo software. An inductive coding process was followed by axial coding to identify patterns and interrelations among themes. Three primary themes emerged from the analysis: (1) legal justifications of security measures, including rule-of-law framing, preventive logic, and judicial endorsement; (2) rights and liberties under pressure, characterized by disproportionate targeting, suppression of dissent, and fear-based public consent; and (3) ethical and institutional dilemmas, such as professional role strain, institutional accountability gaps, and the erosion of democratic norms. Participants described how ambiguous legal terms and selective use of international norms facilitate the normalization of exceptional measures and the marginalization of human rights discourse. Legal narratives in counterterrorism policy are not merely descriptive but deeply constitutive of the security-rights equilibrium. In fragile or securitized contexts, law can function as both a facilitator of repression and a potential site of resistance. Understanding these narratives is crucial for designing legal reforms, enhancing institutional accountability, and protecting fundamental rights.</p> https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/download/43/42