The Role of Ottoman Sultans’ Reform and Modernization Policies in the Collapse of the Empire
Keywords:
Ottoman Empire, modernization, reform policies, dependency theory, cultural hegemony, underdevelopment, state collapseAbstract
This study examines the impact of reform and modernization policies implemented by Ottoman sultans on the eventual collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The research is grounded in the historical paradox whereby ostensibly progressive reforms coincided with heightened internal instability and increasing dependence on external powers. The principal objective is to determine whether these reforms constituted genuine processes of modernization or whether they contributed to the structural weakening of the Empire. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative historical-analytical approach, drawing upon a multi-theoretical framework that incorporates modernization theory, dependency theory, cultural hegemony, and underdevelopment theory. The analysis demonstrates that although the reforms introduced administrative innovations and legal restructuring, they failed to produce sustainable socio-economic transformation or secure national autonomy. The findings indicate a growing reliance on Western institutional models, which undermined internal cohesion and ultimately accelerated the Empire’s decline. The study concludes that reform, when pursued without systemic independence, may reinforce structural dependency rather than generate institutional resilience. These findings contribute to a broader understanding of semi-peripheral modernization processes and their implications for state stability and political collapse.
Downloads
References
1. Smith K. Drift and deviance: Understanding juvenile delinquency in the 21st century. Contemporary Criminology. 2020;35(1).
2. Wilson P, Evans R, Green S. Moral boundaries and criminal behavior: A review. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2019;58(2).
3. Clarke RV. Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. 3rd ed: Routledge; 2017. 45 p.
4. Wilson H, Smith J. Situational crime prevention: Innovations and challenges. Crime Prevention and Community Safety. 2024;26(1).
5. Soztheo.de. Neutralization techniques and drift theory in criminology. Sociology and Theory Journal. 2022;10(1).
6. Wortley R. Understanding moral distortions in offender behavior. Crime and Psychology. 2019;10(1).
7. Cornish D, Clarke RV. Techniques of situational crime prevention. In: Wortley R, Townsley M, editors. Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Routledge; 2019. p. 70-85.
8. Sykes GM, Matza D. Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2018;6(1).
9. Maruna S, Copes H. Neutralizations, techniques of neutralization, and cognitive transformations: From theoretical overview to empirical applications. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2018;70(1):55-68.
10. Taylor J, Green E. Neutralization techniques and contemporary crime: Expanding Matza's framework. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2022;66(1).
11. Hayes H, Carpenter T. Neutralization techniques and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Crime and Justice. 2020;43(1):98-113. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2020.1714539.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Rime (Author); Ghobd Mansourbakht

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.