The Role and Status of the Prosecutor’s Representative in Judicial Hearings

Authors

    Mohammad Reza Nezafat Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, BA.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
    Bagher Shamloo * Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Iran. b_shamloo@sbu.ac.ir
    Alireza Saybani Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, BA.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Keywords:

equality of arms, fair and impartial trial, court, prosecutor, representative (assistant prosecutor

Abstract

An assistant prosecutor, as one of the judicial authorities of the public prosecutor’s office, is not independent vis-à-vis the prosecutor and, acting as the prosecutor’s representative, may—beyond conducting preliminary investigations in criminal cases—perform other duties of the prosecutor as well. Although the assistant prosecutor is not independent of the prosecutor and has no right to formally oppose the prosecutor’s opinion, not all decisions made by the assistant prosecutor require the prosecutor’s express opinion or approval. The lack of independence of the assistant prosecutor and the obligation to follow the prosecutor’s directives do not arise solely from, nor are they limited to, the type or nature of the duty entrusted to the assistant prosecutor. Rather, regardless of which duty the assistant prosecutor undertakes pursuant to the prosecutor’s referral, the assistant prosecutor is obligated to comply with the prosecutor’s authority. The role of the prosecutor’s representative in examining cases varies depending on the subject matter of the case, even in similar offenses. The representative reports the course of proceedings to the prosecutor, thereby keeping the prosecutor informed of developments in the case. In criminal cases, the prosecutor’s representative appears as the public claimant to supervise the correctness of the adjudicative process and to defend the enforcement of law and public rights; the representative’s presence is mandatory and serves a role comparable to that of a judge in safeguarding legal standards, rather than acting as a party to the dispute. Accordingly, the presence of the prosecutor’s representative in criminal courts is compulsory, as the representative is responsible for supervising case proceedings and the proper application of law, protecting public rights and the complainant’s claims, and submitting opinions and briefs in defense of the public interest in criminal cases. Even where there is a private complainant, the prosecutor or the prosecutor’s representative attends to ensure compliance with the law and the order of the court. Therefore, the legal basis for the representative’s presence is to guarantee the observance of justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tahmasebi J. Criminal Procedure. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2017.

2. Salehi MK, Afrasiabi A. The position and powers of the prosecutor in the Iranian criminal proceedings system. Criminal Law Research Quarterly. 2018;7(25).

3. Shamloo Ahmadi MH. Prosecutor's Office and Preliminary Investigations. Tehran: Jangal Publications; 2012.

4. Ghourchi Beygi M. The necessity of the prosecutor's presence in the court session: "From mere presence to active action". Journal of Judicial Precedent. 2016;1(1).

5. Payvast R, Sheidaian M, Salehi MK. Challenges of the prosecutor in implementing a fair trial and its solutions. Criminal Law Research Quarterly. 2022;11(40).

6. Fletcher GP. Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications; 2005.

7. Ebrahimi S. Fair rehabilitation of offenders. Criminal Law Doctrines. 2012;9(3).

8. Najafi Abrandabadi AH. Criminal procedure: The conflict between power-security and individual rights and freedoms. Criminal Procedure: Foundations, Challenges, and Solutions (Collected Articles). Tehran: Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University; 2019.

9. Hassanzadeh M, Safarnia Shahri MR. The validity of the Assistant Prosecutor's (Dadyar) opinion. The Judiciary Law Journal. 2011;75(76).

10. Khazani M. Criminal Process. 1st ed. Tehran: Ganj-e-Danesh; 1998.

11. Javanmard B. The Trial Process in Iranian Criminal Law. 1st ed. Tehran: Behnami; 2010.

12. Amiri A, Tahmasebi J, Pakzad B. The application of assignment management in guaranteeing an impartial criminal trial. The Judiciary Law Journal. 2021;85(114).

13. Moazenzadegan HA, Rahdarpour H. The principle of legal transparency and its place in the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights and Iranian criminal law. Journal of Judicial Law Perspectives. 2018;23(81).

14. Razavi Fard B. International Criminal Law. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2010.

15. Yousefi I. Models of Preliminary Investigations in Criminal Procedure. Tehran: Dayrani Publications; 2013.

16. Najafi Abrandabadi AH. Foundations of Research in the Criminal Justice System: Opportunities and Challenges (Collected Papers). Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2013.

17. Tavakolinia O. The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct from the perspective of Islamic law. Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law. 2021;4(13).

18. Najafi Abrandabadi AH. From classical criminal justice to restorative justice. Legal Doctrines (Razavi University Theology and Law Journal). 2003;3(4).

19. Shamloo B, Gouzali M. Personality files in Iranian and French criminal law. Criminal Law Doctrines. 2011;8(2).

20. Omranifar A, Sheidaian M, Alipour H. Establishing the "Charging" stage in Iranian law with a look at English law (From requirements to providing a desirable model). Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law. 2024;7(24).

21. Gaedi S. Limits of separating the prosecution authority from the investigation authority with emphasis on the 2013 Code of Criminal Procedure: Shiraz University; 2013.

Downloads

Published

2027-01-01

Submitted

2025-08-11

Revised

2025-11-17

Accepted

2025-11-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nezafat, M. R., Shamloo, B., & Saybani, A. (2027). The Role and Status of the Prosecutor’s Representative in Judicial Hearings. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1-16. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/312

Similar Articles

1-10 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.