Perceptions of Access to Justice Among Undocumented Migrants: A Qualitative Case Study

Authors

    Shayesteh Karampour * Department of Civil Law, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran sh.krmpour1374@gmail.com

Keywords:

Undocumented migrants, access to justice, qualitative research, legal exclusion, Tehran, informal justice, rights consciousness, migration policy

Abstract

This study aimed to explore how undocumented migrants residing in Tehran perceive their access to justice, including the barriers they face, the informal mechanisms they rely on, and their underlying aspirations for legal recognition and dignity. This qualitative case study involved in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 18 undocumented migrants from various national backgrounds residing in Tehran. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure diversity in age, gender, and country of origin. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews were conducted in Persian or with interpreter support, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using NVivo software. The analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach, allowing for the identification of patterns, subthemes, and emotional narratives embedded in participant experiences. Four main themes emerged from the analysis: (1) legal invisibility and marginalization, (2) navigating informal systems, (3) experiences with legal institutions, and (4) aspirations and rights consciousness. Participants reported exclusion from legal protections, fear of deportation, limited knowledge of rights, and mistrust of formal institutions. In the absence of legal pathways, many relied on community-based mediation, NGOs, and social networks. Despite these barriers, participants expressed strong desires for legal recognition and dignity, and several demonstrated emerging rights consciousness and engagement with advocacy efforts. Undocumented migrants in Tehran encounter systemic barriers to justice that extend beyond legal status, encompassing emotional, social, and institutional exclusion. While informal support systems provide partial remedies, they cannot replace the need for inclusive, rights-based legal frameworks. Addressing these barriers requires reforms in legal accessibility, anti-discrimination practices, and broader recognition of undocumented individuals as rights-holders within the justice system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Glazebrook, D., Jamshidiha, G., Mahmoudian, H., & Sadeghi, R. (2008). Return to Afghanistan? A study of Afghans living in Tehran. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).

Bosniak, L. (2006). The citizen and the alien: Dilemmas of contemporary membership. Princeton University Press.

Bloch, A., Sigona, N., & Zetter, R. (2011). Migration routes and strategies of young undocumented migrants in England: A qualitative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(8), 1286–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.573439

Coutin, S. B. (2000). Legalizing moves: Salvadoran immigrants’ struggle for U.S. residency. University of Michigan Press.

De Genova, N. (2013). Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783710

Fathollah-Nejad, A. (2020). Iran in an emerging new world order: From Ahmadinejad to Rouhani. Springer.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2017). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12891

Human Rights Watch. (2021). Afghanistan: Iran deports thousands of Afghans. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/11/04/afghanistan-iran-deports-thousands-afghans

International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2022). World migration report 2022. https://www.iom.int/wmr-2022-interactive/

Kubal, A. (2013). Conceptualizing semi-legality in migration research. Law & Society Review, 47(3), 555–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12030

LeVoy, M., Verbruggen, N., & Wets, J. (2004). Undocumented migrant workers in Europe. European Trade Union Confederation.

Majidi, N. (2020). Afghan migration through Iran: Challenges and opportunities. Migration Policy Practice, 10(1), 22–27.

Menjívar, C., & Abrego, L. J. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1380–1421. https://doi.org/10.1086/663575

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2014). The economic, social and cultural rights of migrants in an irregular situation. https://www.ohchr.org

Sigona, N. (2012). ‘I have too much baggage’: The impacts of legal status on the social worlds of irregular migrants. Social Anthropology, 20(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00191.x

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2005). Programming for justice: Access for all. https://www.undp.org

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2016). Rule of law and access to justice. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/access_to_justiceandruleoflaw.html

Vollmer, B. A. (2011). Policy discourses on irregular migration in the EU: "Number games" and "political games". European Journal of Migration and Law, 13(3), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181611X590622

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

Submitted

2022-11-15

Revised

2022-12-16

Accepted

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Karampour, S. (2023). Perceptions of Access to Justice Among Undocumented Migrants: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Human Rights, Law, and Policy, 1(1), 43-53. https://jhrlp.com/index.php/jhrlp/article/view/5

Similar Articles

11-17 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.