Review of the Role of Constitutional Courts in Advancing the Protection of Human Rights and Citizenship in the Digital Age
Keywords:
Civil Rights, Constitution, Court, Digital Age, Human RightsAbstract
In the past, citizenship rights were defined only within national borders. However, today, with the rise of digital citizenship, mass migration, and transnational threats (such as climate change and pandemics), this definition requires urgent revision. These changes have highlighted the need to rethink the foundations of civil rights. The crucial question is whether the current mechanisms for protecting civil rights, given the myriad complexities of the contemporary world, can still guarantee human dignity and fundamental freedoms of individuals. Will constitutional courts, with their traditional approaches, be able to win the new human rights battles in cyberspace, across international borders, and against unknown threats? This problem requires in-depth exploration and the provision of new solutions. The present study, conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, concludes that constitutional courts, although they have consistently defended the rights of citizens, require transnational and interdisciplinary approaches in today's world, which presents new challenges such as technology and immigration. These institutions must move towards internationalization and adhere to universal human rights standards in their constitutional interpretation. Additionally, an interdisciplinary approach is necessary to understand challenges such as digital privacy, which necessitates a comprehensive understanding of technology, sociology, and law. Overall, courts must act beyond the traditional view with boldness, innovation, and continuous engagement to become a haven for justice and human rights in the future.
Downloads
References
1. Mavroudi E, Nagel C. Global migration: Patterns, processes and politics: Routledge; 2023.
2. Mohebbi D, Amiri A. The Balance of the Citizenship Rights and Responsibilities in the Islamic Human Rights System with an Emphasis on Iran's Constitutional Law. 2024.
3. Hosseini Rouhani S. Fiqh of Sadiq (peace be upon him)1992.
4. Khoei SA. Encyclopedia of Imam Al-Khoei (Mawsu'at al-Imam al-Khu'i)1995.
5. Simonelli MA. The European Court of Human Rights and Constitutional Courts: A Study on the ECtHR Case Law: Springer Nature; 2024.
6. Gulyamova G. Term And Concept In Legal Terminology. Academic research in educational sciences. 2022;3(1):181-90.
7. Marashi MH. New Perspectives in Law2006.
8. Mansourian M, Farahmand M. Feasibility Study of Judges' Reliance on the Constitution in Not Implementing Laws that Contradict It. 2020.
9. Haqh Seresht M. The Role of Courts and Constitutional Protection Institutions in Guaranteeing Human Rights. 2021.
10. Raghib Isfahani HbM. Mufradat fi Gharib Al-Quran (Vocabulary in the Strange Terms of the Qur'an)1995.
11. Dehkhoda AA. Dictionary of Dehkhoda (Loghatnameh-ye Dehkhoda)1998.
12. Rashti Najafi MH. Kitab Al-Ghasab (The Book of Usurpation).
13. Trajkovska-Hristovska J. The Role of the Constitutional Court in the Protection of the Human Rights. Język-Szkoła-Religia. 2017;12(4):88-97.
14. Rajaei M, Amiri A. Public Law Challenges in Protecting Human Digital Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. 2025. doi: 10.61838/kman.lsda.184.
15. Bellasio J, Slapakova L, Quimbre F, Stockwell S, Silfversten E. Human rights in the digital age. RAND, 2021.
16. Vojdani E, et al. Challenges of Implementing Electronic Proceedings in Iranian Law from the Perspective of Fair Trial and the Rights of Litigants. 2021.
17. Ansari MbMA. Jurisprudence Treatises (Rasa'il Fiqhiyyah)1994.
18. Fayez A. Comparison and Application in General Criminal Law of Islam1994.
19. Shertouni S. The Nearest Resources (Al-Wasael al-Aqrab)2024.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahdi Rajaei (Author); Ali Amiri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.