The Expansion and Contraction of the Institutional Framework for the Adjudication of Administrative Disputes in the Judicial System of the United Nations
Keywords:
United Nations Administrative Tribunal, United Nations Dispute Tribunal, United Nations Appeals Tribunal, Immunity of International OrganizationsAbstract
The United Nations is a dynamic and global institution that is continuously engaged in the formation of a new order and the transformation from the existing state toward one aligned with justice for the advancement of human society. In pursuit of the objectives set forth in the United Nations Charter, the Organization, through its personnel, implements actions deemed optimal by the majority. In this context, staff members, as the most significant asset of the Organization, are required to undergo changes in order to enhance service delivery. It is therefore possible that, as a consequence of such changes, certain rights of employees may be infringed, necessitating the restoration of those rights through a specialized mechanism. During the period between the decision of the United Nations General Assembly in 1949 and the establishment of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, up to the present time, the system has experienced a trajectory marked by significant developments and challenges. Although the General Assembly, through Resolution 63/253 adopted in 2008, established the United Nations Dispute Tribunal and the United Nations Appeals Tribunal as replacements for the former Administrative Tribunal, the fundamental objective has remained the attainment of justice in the resolution of internal administrative disputes. This article seeks to examine various dimensions of the institutional structure and organizational framework of the United Nations administrative judicial system, as well as the procedures governing the adjudication of disputes.
Downloads
References
1. Amerasinghe CF. Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
2. Momtaz J, Motavasel S. The Right to a Fair Trial in the European Convention on Human Rights. Public Law Studies Quarterly. 2016;46(4).
3. Liu Y. Revisiting the Customary International Law Avenue: Immunity of State Officials of Non-Party States in the Enforcement Proceedings of the International Criminal Court. Chinese Journal of International Law. 2024;23(1).
4. Curzon LB. Dictionary of Law. Harlow: Longman; 2002.
5. Boon KE. The United Nations as Good Samaritan: Immunity and Responsibility. Chicago Journal of International Law. 2016;16(2).
6. Reinisch A. UN Immunity and Access to Dispute Settlement. International Law Seminar; Vienna, Austria: University of Vienna; 2011.
7. Gaillard E, Pingel-Lenuzza I. International Organization and Immunity from Jurisdiction: To Restrict or to Bypass. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2002;51.
8. Mahmoudi Kordi Z. The Nature of General Principles of Law and Their Functions in International Law. International Legal Journal. 2018(58).
9. Reinisch A, Knahr C. From the United Nations Administrative Tribunal to the United Nations Appeals Tribunal: Reform of the Administration of Justice System within the United Nations. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. 2008;12.
10. Zamani SG. Law of International Organizations: Personality, Responsibility, and Immunity. Tehran: Shahr-e Danesh Institute for Legal Studies and Research; 2008.
11. Seatzu F. Introductory Note: The 2021 Judicial Activity of the International Administrative Tribunals. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2022. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2023.
12. Gulati R, Webb P. The Legal Accountability of Transnational Institution: Past, Present and Future. King's Law Journal. 2023;34(3).
13. Katherine M, Rodriguez Rico G. To Join or Not to Join: A Comparative Analysis of Joining or Creating an International Administrative Tribunal. AIIB Yearbook of International Law. 2009;3.
14. Haddadi M, Hekmati Moghaddam SM. Transformation in the Internal Judicial System of the United Nations. Public Law Research Quarterly. 2017(55).
15. Laker T. The United Nations and the (Internal) Administration of Justice. The Rule of Law and Its Application to the United Nations. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG; 2016. p. 311-30.
16. Saha A. Advisory Opinion of the ICJ on the Effects of the Awards of Compensation Made by the UN Administrative Tribunal. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Research. 2024.
17. Ziade NG. Problems of International Administrative Law: On the Occasion of the Twentieth Anniversary of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal. Leiden
Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2008.
18. Ghasemi M. Employment Disputes in International Organizations: Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University; 2012.
19. Girod Laine M. The Evolution of the Independence of the Internal Administrative Judiciary of International Organizations: From the Nineteenth Century to the 2009 Reform of the United Nations: Universite Paris Nanterre; 2017.
20. Vicien Milburn M. The Independence of the UN Administrative Tribunal and Its Legacy. In: Papanikolaou K, Hiskaki M, editors. International Administrative Tribunals in a Changing World: United Nations Administrative Tribunal Conference. New York: Executive Office of the Secretary General; 2007.
21. D'Alessandra F. UN Accountability Mandates in International Justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2023;21(3).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amin Valizadeh (Author); Mehdi Hatami; Farid Azadbakht (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
